For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
When faced with complex phenomena such as mental health, climate systems, or societal transformation, established paradigms frequently demonstrate important limitations. In response, a growing number of scholars from diverse disciplinary backgrounds are increasingly engaging with alternative conceptual frameworks better equipped to address such complexity. Although still emerging and often positioned at the periphery of mainstream academic discourse, these frameworks offer considerable potential for advancing knowledge across a range of domains. Consequently, there is a growing need to foster this process by offering opportunities for meaningful connection and intellectual exchange. In this context, the IAS in Amsterdam stands out as a unique and vital academic space. It fosters interdisciplinary inquiry, promotes the refinement of thinking tools and supports approaches that embrace complexity, questioning foundational assumptions and bridging disciplinary divides. This is precisely why, from the very beginning of my time at IAS, I felt intellectually at home.
Igor Branchi

From February to April 2025, I had the privilege of being a fellow at IAS. This experience offered a rare opportunity to explore the complexity of mental health—and life sciences more broadly—through an interdisciplinary lens. Engaging with Denny Borsboom and other scholars from psychology, sociology, data science, and other fields enriched my perspective on complexity and the importance of integrating diverse methodologies to address multifaceted challenges. The collaborations initiated during this time laid the groundwork for current projects aimed at developing comprehensive models of mental health. Particularly impactful was my interaction with the Directors of the Centre for Urban Mental Health, Claudi Bockting, Reinout Weirs and Harm Krugers, who welcomed me into their initiatives. Their work offered a compelling demonstration of how principles from complexity science can be meaningfully applied to address real-world problems.

The nurturing intellectual environment at IAS fostered the conceptual refinement of my ideas about plasticity as a operationalizable, system-level property. During the fellowship, I explored whether connectivity patterns—whether between brain regions, behavioral components, or symptom networks—could serve as a measure of the individual’s capacity to change. This line of inquiry aims to establish novel and effective early markers of transitions between mental states, such as the transition from psychopathology to wellbeing. The goal was not merely to describe psychological phenomena, but to uncover the underlying principles that govern their emergence and evolution. By making complexity both visible and theoretically actionable, this approach aspires to contribute to the development of more precise, personalized, and preventive models of mental health care.

Last but not least, the process leading to good science and a genuine understanding of complexity is an emergent property arising from the convergence of multiple essential elements, none of which is sufficient on its own. Huub Dijstelbloem and Julia Hoffmann, who lead and manage the IAS, created the right blend of all of these: outstanding scientific quality, a culture of openness, and a welcoming social environment. This spirit was evident not only in the interactions with fellow scientists but also in the daily support and enthusiasm of the extraordinary IAS office, who play a crucial role in the success of this unique endeavor.